Rose suggests this attitude, which is compounded by the heat, is counterproductive to the notion of active citizenship. The gradual self-awareness and enlightenment of many of the jurors helps the collective team more effectively scrutinise the evidence.
That's enough for me'. Here are some of the observations: As the tempers flare and the arguments begin, the audience learns about each member of the jury. Similarly, juror 10 is prejudiced towards the accused because he the accused is from the slums.
The 8th Juror also represents possible strengths of the jury system as an element of the legal system. He wishes to punish the young boy for the pain his own son has inflicted upon him.
The deconstruction of these obstacles finally paves the way for an honest and just outcome. As Rose points out, group dynamics — the interaction of a range of volatile and sensitive personalities — has an impact on the discussion. The 3rd and 10th jurors are typical of those who discriminate against the boy from the start of the trial by virtue of his poverty-stricken background and dysfunctional upbringing.
This motivation consequently impacts his ability to make a rational, emotionally detached decision. Despite this, it becomes clear that the defendant has a received a impartial hearing, and is saved from injustice.
It is for a range of reasons that the jury in Twelve Angry Men Reginald Rose find it hard to reach a unified decision. Also, by concluding the play without ever informing the audience whether the defendant is guilty or innocent indicates that the truth about the events in question will never be revealed.
They want a quick verdict. He often goads or provokes the jurors in order to gain a reaction: Similarly, juror 10 is prejudiced towards the accused because he the accused is from the slums.
This process proves very hard, and therefore contributes towards the difficulty of reaching a final determination. Similarly other jurors also have personal commitments and experiences that predispose them to react to the evidence in varied ways.
English focuses on critical thinking, argumentation, persuasion, and analytical arguments. This is supported by the 3rd Juror's reluctance to changing his initial 'guilty' verdict and the manner in which he characterizes'kids. Sep 19, · Issues to find the truth of a young boy's guilt or innocence - Twelve Angry Men: Text response essay  - Book Reports Twelve Angry Men: an exploration man's fallibilities and the essentials of group dynamics  - Essays.
Open Document. Below is an essay on "Twelve Angry Men Text Response" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples. Other times, it works positively for the boy such as in the 9th juror’s response to the evidence of the old man.
Twelve Angry Men: Text Pairs Year (George Orwell) Ransom (David Malouf) Tracks (Robyn Davidson). Below is an essay on "12 Angry Men Response" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples.
12 Angry Men Response The film, “12 Angry Men,” directed by Sidney Lumet tells the story of twelve jurors who are chosen to. Open Document. Below is an essay on "Twelve Angry Men Text Response" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples.
The setting of 12 Angry Men is a jury deliberation room where the jurors are and required to decide the guilt or innocence of an 18 year old that is accused of committing first-degree murder by stabbing his father with a switchblade knife.12 angry men text response essay